2026-05-19
Russell E. Lewis, Pharm.D., FCCP
Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases
russelledward.lewis@unipd.it
Slides and course materials: www.idpadovaid.com
Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (2010-2020) provided “push incentives” →17 new systemic antibiotics approved, including agents targeting CRE and MRSA
| Incentive | Mechanism |
|---|---|
| Extended exclusivity | Additional 5 years market protection |
| Fast track designation | Accelerated development pathway |
| Priority review | 6-month vs. 10-month FDA review |
Push incentives– Attempted to delink company revenue from antibiotic sales volume, thereby encouraging development of new antimicrobials-i.e. Netflix models
Italy (Legge di Bilancio 2025) Article 49 - allowed certain WHO AWaRe “Reserve” antibiotics targeting multidrug-resistant organisms to access the national Innovative Medicines Fund
Created access to up to €100 million annually for qualifying reserve antibiotics- privileged reimbursement and protection from hospital budget disincentives
Linked reimbursement to therapeutic innovativeness and stewardship monitoring
Timeline:
Assessment criteria (MCDA framework):
Key changes from 2017:
| Pathogen | Resistance pattern |
|---|---|
| Acinetobacter baumannii | Carbapenem-resistant (CRAB) |
| Enterobacterales (K. pneumoniae, E. coli, others) | Carbapenem-resistant (CRE) |
| Enterobacterales (K. pneumoniae, E. coli, others) | 3rd-generation cephalosporin-resistant (ESBL) |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | Rifampicin-resistant |
Novel agents covered in this lecture: Sulbactam-durlobactam (CRAB), multiple BL/BLI combinations & oral carbapenems (CRE/ESBL)
| Pathogen | Resistance pattern |
|---|---|
| Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi | Fluoroquinolone-resistant |
| Shigella spp. | Fluoroquinolone-resistant |
| Enterococcus faecium | Vancomycin-resistant (VRE) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Carbapenem-resistant |
| Non-typhoidal Salmonella | Fluoroquinolone-resistant |
| Neisseria gonorrhoeae | 3rd-gen cephalosporin- and/or FQ-resistant |
| Staphylococcus aureus | Methicillin-resistant (MRSA) |
Novel agents covered: Ceftobiprole (MRSA), Gepotidacin & Zoliflodacin (N. gonorrhoeae)
| Pathogen | Resistance pattern |
|---|---|
| Group A streptococci | Macrolide-resistant |
| Streptococcus pneumoniae | Macrolide-resistant |
| Haemophilus influenzae | Ampicillin-resistant |
| Group B streptococci | Penicillin-resistant |
These pathogens have a disproportionate impact on infants, young adults,
and older adults, especially in resource-limited settings.
| Class | Type | Examples | Inhibited by |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Serine | KPC, CTX-M, TEM, SHV | Avibactam, Vaborbactam, Xeruborbactam |
| B | Metallo (MBL) | NDM, VIM, IMP | Aztreonam stability only; Xeruborbactam, Taniborbactam |
| C | Serine (AmpC) | AmpC | Avibactam, Xeruborbactam |
| D | Serine (OXA) | OXA-23, OXA-48 | Durlobactam, Avibactam (limited), Xeruborbactam |
Critical Point
Class B MBLs remain the greatest challenge - no approved inhibitor exists, but taniborbactam and xeruborbactam are in development
Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs):
Mechanism: Covalent, reversible binding to serine β-lactamases
Boronates:
Mechanism: Reversible binding, broader spectrum including some MBLs
Key Innovation
Taniborbactam and xeruborbactam are the first inhibitors with activity against Class B metallo-β-lactamases (NDM, VIM); xeruborbactam also inhibits IMP
🔵 β-Lactam/BLI
🟡 Oral Carbapenems
🟣 Gram-Positive
🟢 Topoisomerase
FDA Approved: May 2023 for HABP/VABP due to A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. Not approved in Italy (yet) but can be requested by emergency authorization.
Sulbactam:
Durlobactam:
Why This Matters
OXA-type carbapenemases (OXA-23, OXA-24/40) are the predominant resistance mechanism in A. baumannii worldwide
Result: Durlobactam restores sulbactam activity by inhibiting the β-lactamases that would otherwise hydrolyze it
Global surveillance: 5,032 A. baumannii clinical isolates
| Agent | MIC50 | MIC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Sulbactam-Durlobactam | 1 mg/L | 2 mg/L |
| Sulbactam alone | 8 mg/L | 64 mg/L |
| Imipenem | >8 mg/L | >8 mg/L |
| Colistin | 1 mg/L | 2 mg/L |
Susceptibility breakpoint
FDA/CLSI susceptibility: ≤4/4 mg/L for SUL-DUR
32-fold reduction in MIC90 with durlobactam addition
Phase 1 PK data (healthy adults):
Recommended Dosing
Sulbactam-Durlobactam 2 g (1 g + 1 g)
Phase 3, Two-part registrational trial
Randomized, controlled comparison
Supportive open-label study
Part A: m-MITT Population (n = 64 per arm)
| Outcome | SUL-DUR | Colistin | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28-day mortality | 19.0% | 32.3% | −13.2% |
| Clinical cure | 61.9% | 40.3% | +21.6% |
| Drug-related AEs | 12.3% | 30.2% | −17.9% |
| Nephrotoxicity (RIFLE) | 13.2% | 37.6% | −24.4%* |
*P = 0.0002
Key Finding
Noninferiority achieved with numerically better mortality, clinical cure, AND reduced nephrotoxicity
Key points:
✓ First agent specifically developed for CRAB
✓ Novel OXA-family inhibition
✓ Mortality benefit suggested vs. colistin
✓ Significantly reduced nephrotoxicity
✓ FDA approved May 2023
Limitations:
Clinical Pearl
SUL-DUR represents a paradigm shift in CRAB treatment - from toxic colistin-based regimens to a more effective, safer β-lactam approach
Under development for MDR gram-negative infections including MBL-producers
The problem:
The solution:
Enterobacterales surveillance (2019-2021): 27,834 isolates
| Population | ATM-AVI Susceptibility |
|---|---|
| All Enterobacterales | >99.9% at ≤8 mg/L |
| CRE (n = 261) | 99.6% |
| MBL-producers (n = 33) | 100% |
Important limitation
ATM-AVI has limited activity against P. aeruginosa including MBL-producing strains → it has limited ability to penetrate the outer membrane and is readily effluxed
MIC50/90: 0.25/0.5 mg/L for Enterobacterales
Based on Phase 1 PK-PD modeling:
Recommended Regimen
Loading dose: ATM-AVI 500-167 mg
Maintenance: ATM-AVI 1500-500 mg
Rationale for loading dose:
Open-label comparison in cIAI, HABP, VABP:
| Indication | ATM-AVI Mortality | Comparator Mortality |
|---|---|---|
| cIAI | 1.9% (4/208) | 2.9% (3/104) |
| HABP/VABP | 10.8% (8/74) | 19.4% (7/36) |
MBL-producing infections specifically:
Current status
FDA approval in February 2025. Available in Italy but drug shortages in 2026 have limited supply.Considered a “critical-reserve” antibiotic
FDA approved: February 2024 for cUTI including acute pyelonephritis
Enmetazobactam:
Activity:
Target population:
| Target organisms | Proportion |
|---|---|
| ESBL-producers | ~70% |
| AmpC | ~20% |
| Other | ~10% |
Primarily ESBL-producing Enterobacterales
Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Noninferiority Trial (cUTI/AP)
Primary Analysis (n = 678):
| Outcome | FEP-ENM | PIP-TAZ |
|---|---|---|
| Composite cure | 79.1% | 58.9% |
Δ = 21.2% (95% CI: 14.3-27.9%)
ESBL Subset:
Where FEP-ENM shines
Important
Not just noninferior - statistically superior to piperacillin-tazobactam
In development for CRE and MBL-producing infections
Taniborbactam:
Dosing:
CERTAIN-1 Trial:
Phase 3 in cUTI/AP showed superiority to meropenem
Why this matters
If approved, FEP-TAN would be the first single agent effective against both serine carbapenemases AND most MBLs
In development for XDR gram-negative infections
Zidebactam - Unique mechanism:
β-Lactam Enhancer:
Inhibits class A and C ß-lactamases
Strong PBP2 binding
Complements cefepime’s PBP3, PBP1a/1b binding
Synergistic cell wall disruption
Spectrum:
Dosing: 3 g (2 g + 1 g) q8h over 3 hours
Compassionate Use
Successful outcomes reported for NDM-producing P. aeruginosa infection
In development for CRE, MBL, and CRAB infections
Xeruborbactam:
Dosing:
Key Trials:
Why this matters
MER-XER is the only combination in development with activity across all four Ambler classes including IMP-type MBLs, potentially covering CRE, MBL-producers, and CRAB with a single agent
| Agent | Class A | Class B (MBL) | Class C | Class D | Target Pathogens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUL-DUR | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓✓ | CRAB |
| ATM-AVI | ✓ | Stable* | ✓ | ± | MBL-Enterobacterales |
| FEP-ENM | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ESBL |
| FEP-TAN | ✓ | VIM, NDM | ✓ | ✓ | CRE, MBL |
| FEP-ZID | ✓ | Enhanced | ✓ | ✓ | XDR-PA, CRE |
| MER-XER | ✓ | NDM, VIM, IMP | ✓ | ✓ | CRE, MBL, CRAB |
*Aztreonam stable to MBLs; avibactam covers serine enzymes
Selection Guide
- CRAB → Sulbactam-durlobactam or MER-XER (when available) - MBL-Enterobacterales → ATM-AVI, FEP-TAN, or MER-XER (when available) - ESBL → Cefepime-enmetazobactam - XDR Pseudomonas → Cefepime-zidebactam (when available)
The clinical need:
Two agents in development:
| Agent | Status | Primary Indication |
|---|---|---|
| Tebipenem | Likely approval in 2026 | cUTI/AP |
| Sulopenem | FDA Approved | uUTI |
Oral carbapenem prodrug (pivoxil hydrobromide)
Spectrum:
ADAPT-PO Trial:
Current Status
Initial NDA insufficient for FDA approval - PIVOT-PO trial (vs. IV imipenem) ongoing
FDA approved for uncomplicated UTI → Currently no EMA authorization
Spectrum:
Development Path:
Clinical Niche
Sulopenem offers an oral option for patients with MDR gram-negative uUTI who have limited other oral alternatives
FDA Approved for multiple MRSA indications
Mechanism:
Approved Indications:
Dosing:
ERADICATE Trial:
Noninferior to daptomycin for complicated S. aureus bacteremia
Novel oxazolidinone in development
Design Goal:
Reduce myelosuppression and serotonergic effects
seen with linezolid/tedizolid
Spectrum:
Phase 3 (cSSTI):
Noninferior to linezolid with potentially better safety
Availability:
Novel FabI inhibitor with unique selectivity
Mechanism:
Not active against:
Clinical Development:
Advantages:
First-in-class triazaacenaphthylene for uUTI and gonorrhea
Mechanism:
Spectrum:
Dosing (oral):
Phase 3 Results:
Addressing a Critical Need
Gepotidacin provides an oral option for gonorrhea - crucial as resistance to ceftriaxone emerges
First-in-class spiropyrimidinetrione for N. gonorrhoeae
Mechanism:
Key advantage:
Active against strains resistant to:
Phase 3 Results:
Single 3-g oral dose:
Clinical Pearl
Single-dose oral therapy dramatically improves treatment adherence - critical for STI management
Ridinilazole:
Ibezapolstat:
| Agent | Target | Key Indications | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUL-DUR | CRAB | HABP/VABP | FDA approved, AIFA waiting |
| ATM-AVI | MBL-Enterobacterales | cIAI, HABP/VABP | Late development |
| FEP-ENM | ESBL | cUTI/AP | FDA approved, No AIFA approval |
| FEP-TAN | CRE, MBL | cUTI/AP | Phase 3 complete |
| FEP-ZID | XDR-PA, CRE | cUTI/AP | Phase 3 |
| MER-XER | CRE, MBL, CRAB | cUTI/AP, HABP/VABP | Phase 3 |
| Sulopenem | MDR Enterobacterales | uUTI | FDA approved |
| Ceftobiprole | MRSA | Bacteremia, ABSSSI, CABP | FDA, AIFA approved |
| Gepotidacin | MDR E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae | uUTI, gonorrhea | FDA approved, AIFA waiting |
| Zoliflodacin | MDR N. gonorrhoeae | Gonorrhea | FDA approved, AIFA waiting |
The AMR challenge is growing - MDR organisms continue to emerge faster than new treatments
Critical priority pathogens (CRAB, CRE) now have improved treatment options with novel BL/BLI combinations
MBL-producing organisms - ATM-AVI and FEP-TAN address this previously untreatable gap
Oral options expanding - Sulopenem, tebipenem, gepotidacin (Ross et al., 2025; Wagenlehner et al., 2024)
Economic sustainability remains a challenge - pull incentives needed alongside push incentives
Antimicrobial stewardship essential - new agents should be reserved for appropriate indications
Promising developments:
Ongoing challenges:
Final Thought
New antibiotics are necessary but not sufficient - stewardship, infection prevention, and diagnostics must work together to combat AMR
| Agent | Dose | Frequency | Infusion | Renal Adjustment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUL-DUR | 2 g (1g-1g) | q6h | 3 hours | Yes |
| ATM-AVI | 1500-500 mg* | q6h | 3 hours | Yes |
| FEP-ENM | 2-0.5 g | q8h | 2 hours | Yes |
| FEP-TAN | 2.5 g (2g-500mg) | q8h | 2 hours | Yes |
| FEP-ZID | 3 g (2g-1g) | q8h | 3 hours | Yes |
| MER-XER | 2-1 g | q8h | 3 hours | Yes |
| Ceftobiprole | 500 mg | q6-8h | 2 hours | Yes |
*Loading dose: 500-167 mg
Clinical Pearl
Extended infusions optimize time above MIC for these β-lactam agents