Antibiotics in Advanced Development

Russell E. Lewis

2026-05-19

Antibiotics for MDR Pathogens in Advanced Stages
of Clinical Development





Russell E. Lewis, Pharm.D., FCCP
Associate Professor of Infectious Diseases


russelledward.lewis@unipd.it
Slides and course materials: www.idpadovaid.com

Part 1: The AMR Crisis
and Priority Pathogens

Antibiotic development vs. resistance

The antimicrobial resistance crisis



Current impact:

  • 700,000 deaths annually attributed to AMR
  • MDR organisms have limited treatment options
  • Resistance detected after every new antibiotic introduction

Projected impact:

  • 10 million deaths/year by 2050 if unchecked
  • Economic burden estimated at $100 trillion

Legislative efforts:
The GAIN Act (2012) in US and Italian Progress


Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (2010-2020) provided “push incentives” →17 new systemic antibiotics approved, including agents targeting CRE and MRSA

Incentive Mechanism
Extended exclusivity Additional 5 years market protection
Fast track designation Accelerated development pathway
Priority review 6-month vs. 10-month FDA review


  • Push incentives– Attempted to delink company revenue from antibiotic sales volume, thereby encouraging development of new antimicrobials-i.e. Netflix models

  • Italy (Legge di Bilancio 2025) Article 49 - allowed certain WHO AWaRe “Reserve” antibiotics targeting multidrug-resistant organisms to access the national Innovative Medicines Fund

  • Created access to up to €100 million annually for qualifying reserve antibiotics- privileged reimbursement and protection from hospital budget disincentives

  • Linked reimbursement to therapeutic innovativeness and stewardship monitoring

The Plazomicin case study: A cautionary tale


Timeline:

  • FDA approval obtained for new aminoglycoside targeting resistant gram-negatives
  • Drug reserved as “last resort” therapy (appropriate stewardship)
  • Low sales volume due to targeted use
  • Company could not sustain itself financially
  • The lesson: Push incentives support development but fail to ensure post-approval sustainability
  • New focus: Pull incentives (subscription models) that reward societal value rather than sales volume

WHO Priority Pathogens List (2024 Update)


Assessment criteria (MCDA framework):

  1. Mortality & non-fatal burden
  2. Incidence & 10-year resistance trends
  3. Transmissibility & preventability
  4. Treatability & antibacterial pipeline

Key changes from 2017:

  • Rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis added to critical tier
  • Salmonella Typhi & Shigella spp. elevated to high priority
  • P. aeruginosa reclassified from critical → high
  • H. pylori, Campylobacter spp. removed



Critical priority pathogens


Pathogen Resistance pattern
Acinetobacter baumannii Carbapenem-resistant (CRAB)
Enterobacterales (K. pneumoniae, E. coli, others) Carbapenem-resistant (CRE)
Enterobacterales (K. pneumoniae, E. coli, others) 3rd-generation cephalosporin-resistant (ESBL)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampicin-resistant


Novel agents covered in this lecture: Sulbactam-durlobactam (CRAB), multiple BL/BLI combinations & oral carbapenems (CRE/ESBL)

High priority pathogens


Pathogen Resistance pattern
Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi Fluoroquinolone-resistant
Shigella spp. Fluoroquinolone-resistant
Enterococcus faecium Vancomycin-resistant (VRE)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Carbapenem-resistant
Non-typhoidal Salmonella Fluoroquinolone-resistant
Neisseria gonorrhoeae 3rd-gen cephalosporin- and/or FQ-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin-resistant (MRSA)



Novel agents covered: Ceftobiprole (MRSA), Gepotidacin & Zoliflodacin (N. gonorrhoeae)

Medium priority pathogens


Pathogen Resistance pattern
Group A streptococci Macrolide-resistant
Streptococcus pneumoniae Macrolide-resistant
Haemophilus influenzae Ampicillin-resistant
Group B streptococci Penicillin-resistant



These pathogens have a disproportionate impact on infants, young adults,
and older adults, especially in resource-limited settings.

β-Lactamase classification: Ambler system


Class Type Examples Inhibited by
A Serine KPC, CTX-M, TEM, SHV Avibactam, Vaborbactam, Xeruborbactam
B Metallo (MBL) NDM, VIM, IMP Aztreonam stability only; Xeruborbactam, Taniborbactam
C Serine (AmpC) AmpC Avibactam, Xeruborbactam
D Serine (OXA) OXA-23, OXA-48 Durlobactam, Avibactam (limited), Xeruborbactam



Critical Point


Class B MBLs remain the greatest challenge - no approved inhibitor exists, but taniborbactam and xeruborbactam are in development

Novel β-Lactamase inhibitor classes


Diazabicyclooctanes (DBOs):

  • Avibactam
  • Relebactam
  • Durlobactam (OXA activity!)
  • Zidebactam

Mechanism: Covalent, reversible binding to serine β-lactamases

Boronates:

  • Vaborbactam
  • Taniborbactam (MBL activity!)
  • Xeruborbactam (ultra-broad spectrum!)


Mechanism: Reversible binding, broader spectrum including some MBLs

Key Innovation


Taniborbactam and xeruborbactam are the first inhibitors with activity against Class B metallo-β-lactamases (NDM, VIM); xeruborbactam also inhibits IMP

Lecture roadmap: Agents we’ll cover


🔵 β-Lactam/BLI

  • Sulbactam-Durlobactam
  • Aztreonam-Avibactam
  • Cefepime-Enmetazobactam
  • Cefepime-Taniborbactam
  • Cefepime-Zidebactam
  • Meropenem-Xeruborbactam

🟡 Oral Carbapenems

  • Tebipenem
  • Sulopenem

🟣 Gram-Positive

  • Ceftobiprole
  • Contezolid
  • Afabicin

🟢 Topoisomerase

  • Gepotidacin
  • Zoliflodacin

Part 2: β-Lactam/
β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

Sulbactam-Durlobactam (Xacduro™)


FDA Approved: May 2023 for HABP/VABP due to A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. Not approved in Italy (yet) but can be requested by emergency authorization.


Sulbactam:

  • Historically a β-lactamase inhibitor
  • Intrinsic activity against A. baumannii
  • Binds PBP 1a/1b and PBP3
  • Limited by contemporary resistance by class A,C and D enzymes


Durlobactam:

  • Novel DBO inhibitor
  • Inhibits Class A, C, and D enzymes
  • Unique OXA family activity
  • Direct antibacterial activity via PBP2

Why This Matters


OXA-type carbapenemases (OXA-23, OXA-24/40) are the predominant resistance mechanism in A. baumannii worldwide

SUL-DUR: Mechanism of action



Result: Durlobactam restores sulbactam activity by inhibiting the β-lactamases that would otherwise hydrolyze it

SUL-DUR: In vitro activity


Global surveillance: 5,032 A. baumannii clinical isolates

Agent MIC50 MIC90
Sulbactam-Durlobactam 1 mg/L 2 mg/L
Sulbactam alone 8 mg/L 64 mg/L
Imipenem >8 mg/L >8 mg/L
Colistin 1 mg/L 2 mg/L

Susceptibility breakpoint


FDA/CLSI susceptibility: ≤4/4 mg/L for SUL-DUR

32-fold reduction in MIC90 with durlobactam addition

SUL-DUR: Pharmacokinetics and dosing


Phase 1 PK data (healthy adults):

  • Linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics
  • Primary clearance: Renal excretion
  • Half-life: 1.4–3.6 hours
  • Minimal accumulation with multiple dosing

Recommended Dosing


Sulbactam-Durlobactam 2 g (1 g + 1 g)

  • 3-hour IV infusion
  • Every 6 hours
  • Renal dose adjustment required for CrCl <90 mL/min

SUL-DUR: ATTACK trial design


Phase 3, Two-part registrational trial

Randomized, controlled comparison

  • Population: HABP, VABP, BSI due to CRAB
  • Intervention: SUL-DUR 2g (1g-1g) q6h over 3h
  • Comparator: Colistin 2.5 mg/kg q12h over 30 min
  • Background: Imipenem-cilastatin 1g-1g q6h (both arms)
  • Primary endpoint: 28-day all-cause mortality

Supportive open-label study

  • Patients with colistin-resistant A. baumannii
  • Or polymyxin-intolerant patients
  • Multiple infection types: HABP, VABP, BSI, cUTI, AP, wound infections

SUL-DUR: ATTACK trial results


Part A: m-MITT Population (n = 64 per arm)

Outcome SUL-DUR Colistin Difference
28-day mortality 19.0% 32.3% −13.2%
Clinical cure 61.9% 40.3% +21.6%
Drug-related AEs 12.3% 30.2% −17.9%
Nephrotoxicity (RIFLE) 13.2% 37.6% −24.4%*

*P = 0.0002

Key Finding


Noninferiority achieved with numerically better mortality, clinical cure, AND reduced nephrotoxicity

SUL-DUR: Clinical summary


Key points:

✓ First agent specifically developed for CRAB

✓ Novel OXA-family inhibition

✓ Mortality benefit suggested vs. colistin

✓ Significantly reduced nephrotoxicity

✓ FDA approved May 2023

Limitations:

  • Limited to A. baumannii
  • No activity against MBL-producers
  • Requires IV administration
  • Background imipenem in trials



Clinical Pearl


SUL-DUR represents a paradigm shift in CRAB treatment - from toxic colistin-based regimens to a more effective, safer β-lactam approach

Aztreonam-avibactam: The MBL solution


Under development for MDR gram-negative infections including MBL-producers


The problem:

  • MBLs (NDM, VIM, IMP) hydrolyze all β-lactams
  • No approved MBL inhibitor exists
  • MBL-producers often co-produce serine β-lactamases

The solution:

  • Aztreonam is intrinsically stable to MBLs
  • Avibactam inhibits co-produced serine enzymes
  • Combination restores aztreonam activity
Aztreonam
MBL
Stable
Serine BL
Hydrolyzed
Protected
✓ Active Drug
✗ Inactive
✓ Active Drug
Avibactam → Inhibits Serine BL → Protects Aztreonam


ATM-AVI: In vitro activity


Enterobacterales surveillance (2019-2021): 27,834 isolates


Population ATM-AVI Susceptibility
All Enterobacterales >99.9% at ≤8 mg/L
CRE (n = 261) 99.6%
MBL-producers (n = 33) 100%


Important limitation


ATM-AVI has limited activity against P. aeruginosa including MBL-producing strains → it has limited ability to penetrate the outer membrane and is readily effluxed

MIC50/90: 0.25/0.5 mg/L for Enterobacterales

ATM-AVI: Dosing strategy


Based on Phase 1 PK-PD modeling:

Recommended Regimen


Loading dose: ATM-AVI 500-167 mg

Maintenance: ATM-AVI 1500-500 mg

  • 3-hour IV infusion
  • Every 6 hours
  • Target: ƒT > MIC of 60% up to MIC 8 mg/L

Rationale for loading dose:

  • Achieves steady-state exposure rapidly
  • Critical for severe infections
  • Compensates for renal clearance of both agents

ATM-AVI: Clinical development status


Open-label comparison in cIAI, HABP, VABP:

  • ATM-AVI ± metronidazole vs. meropenem ± colistin
  • Results support efficacy
Indication ATM-AVI Mortality Comparator Mortality
cIAI 1.9% (4/208) 2.9% (3/104)
HABP/VABP 10.8% (8/74) 19.4% (7/36)

MBL-producing infections specifically:

  • Terminated early (15/60 planned patients enrolled)
  • Enrollment extremely difficult
  • TOC results: 5/12 (41.7%) ATM-AVI cured vs. 0/3 best available therapy

Current status


FDA approval in February 2025. Available in Italy but drug shortages in 2026 have limited supply.Considered a “critical-reserve” antibiotic

Cefepime-enmetazobactam (Exblifep®)


FDA approved: February 2024 for cUTI including acute pyelonephritis

Enmetazobactam:

  • N-methyl derivative of tazobactam
  • Net-neutral zwitterion
  • Enhanced cell wall penetration
  • Class A enzyme inhibition

Activity:

  • CTX-M, TEM, SHV variants
  • NOT serine carbapenemases (KPC)
  • No advantages for P. aeruginosa

Target population:

Target organisms Proportion
ESBL-producers ~70%
AmpC ~20%
Other ~10%

Primarily ESBL-producing Enterobacterales

FEP-ENM: ALLIUM trial results


Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Noninferiority Trial (cUTI/AP)

Primary Analysis (n = 678):

Outcome FEP-ENM PIP-TAZ
Composite cure 79.1% 58.9%

Δ = 21.2% (95% CI: 14.3-27.9%)

  • Noninferiority achieved ✓
  • Hierarchical superiority achieved

ESBL Subset:

  • FEP-ENM: 73.7%
  • PIP-TAZ: 51.5%

Where FEP-ENM shines

Important

Not just noninferior - statistically superior to piperacillin-tazobactam

Cefepime-taniborbactam


In development for CRE and MBL-producing infections

Taniborbactam:

  • Bicyclic boronate inhibitor
  • Class A, C, D serine enzymes
  • Class B MBL activity:
    • VIM: Yes ✓
    • Most NDM: Yes ✓
    • IMP: Limited
  • MDR P.aeruginosa PDC and PER-1/2

Dosing:

  • 2.5 g (2 g + 500 mg)
  • Every 8 hours
  • 2-hour infusion

CERTAIN-1 Trial:

Phase 3 in cUTI/AP showed superiority to meropenem

Why this matters


If approved, FEP-TAN would be the first single agent effective against both serine carbapenemases AND most MBLs

Cefepime-zidebactam


In development for XDR gram-negative infections

Zidebactam - Unique mechanism:

β-Lactam Enhancer:

  • Inhibits class A and C ß-lactamases

  • Strong PBP2 binding

  • Complements cefepime’s PBP3, PBP1a/1b binding

  • Synergistic cell wall disruption

Spectrum:

  • Enterobacterales (including CRE)
  • XDR P. aeruginosa (including MBL) despite lack of activity against Class B enzymes
  • A. baumannii complex

Dosing: 3 g (2 g + 1 g) q8h over 3 hours

Compassionate Use


Successful outcomes reported for NDM-producing P. aeruginosa infection

Meropenem-Xeruborbactam (MER-XER)


In development for CRE, MBL, and CRAB infections

Xeruborbactam:

  • Tricyclic boronate inhibitor
  • Ultra-broad spectrum BLI:
    • Class A (KPC, CTX-M, TEM, SHV) ✓
    • Class B MBLs (NDM, VIM, IMP) ✓
    • Class C (AmpC) ✓
    • Class D (OXA-23, OXA-48) ✓
  • Broadest BLI spectrum in development

Dosing:

  • 2-1 g q8h
  • 3-hour infusion
  • Renal dose adjustment required

Key Trials:

  • Phase 3 in cUTI/AP and HABP/VABP
  • Targets CRE, MBL-producers, and CRAB

Why this matters


MER-XER is the only combination in development with activity across all four Ambler classes including IMP-type MBLs, potentially covering CRE, MBL-producers, and CRAB with a single agent

BL/BLI Combinations: Comparative Summary


Agent Class A Class B (MBL) Class C Class D Target Pathogens
SUL-DUR ✓✓ CRAB
ATM-AVI Stable* ± MBL-Enterobacterales
FEP-ENM ESBL
FEP-TAN VIM, NDM CRE, MBL
FEP-ZID Enhanced XDR-PA, CRE
MER-XER NDM, VIM, IMP CRE, MBL, CRAB

*Aztreonam stable to MBLs; avibactam covers serine enzymes

Selection Guide


- CRAB → Sulbactam-durlobactam or MER-XER (when available) - MBL-Enterobacterales → ATM-AVI, FEP-TAN, or MER-XER (when available) - ESBL → Cefepime-enmetazobactam - XDR Pseudomonas → Cefepime-zidebactam (when available)

Part 3: Oral Carbapenems and
Other Novel Agents

Oral carbapenems: Addressing the IV-to-PO gap


The clinical need:

  • Patients stable on IV carbapenems
  • Need oral step-down therapy
  • Current options limited for MDR gram-negatives


Two agents in development:


Agent Status Primary Indication
Tebipenem Likely approval in 2026 cUTI/AP
Sulopenem FDA Approved uUTI

Tebipenem


Oral carbapenem prodrug (pivoxil hydrobromide)

Spectrum:

  • MDR Enterobacterales
  • ESBL-producers
  • Selected gram-positives
  • NOT carbapenemase-producers

ADAPT-PO Trial:

  • Tebipenem 600 mg PO q8h
  • vs. ertapenem 1 g IV daily
  • Noninferiority achieved
  • Similar safety profile

Current Status


Initial NDA insufficient for FDA approval - PIVOT-PO trial (vs. IV imipenem) ongoing

Sulopenem (Orlynvah)


FDA approved for uncomplicated UTI → Currently no EMA authorization

Spectrum:

  • MDR Enterobacterales
  • ESBL-producers
  • AmpC-producers
  • NOT carbapenemase-producers

Development Path:

  • Initial Phase 3: Variable results
  • REASSURE Trial: Noninferiority to amoxicillin-clavulanate achieved
  • NDA resubmitted 2024

Clinical Niche


Sulopenem offers an oral option for patients with MDR gram-negative uUTI who have limited other oral alternatives

Ceftobiprole (Zevtera/Mabelio):
Fifth-generation cephalosporin


FDA Approved for multiple MRSA indications

Mechanism:

  • Inhibits PBPs including PBP2a
  • Active against MRSA
  • Broad gram-positive/gram-negative activity

Approved Indications:

  • S. aureus bacteremia
  • Right-sided endocarditis
  • ABSSSI
  • Community-acquired pneumonia
  • Role in HAP/VAP- higher mortality than comparator

Dosing:

  • 500 mg IV over 2 hours
  • Every 6-8 hours
  • Renal adjustment required

ERADICATE Trial:

Noninferior to daptomycin for complicated S. aureus bacteremia

Contezolid: Safer oxazolidinone?


Novel oxazolidinone in development

Design Goal:

Reduce myelosuppression and serotonergic effects
seen with linezolid/tedizolid

Spectrum:

  • MRSA
  • VRE
  • Penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae

Phase 3 (cSSTI):

Noninferior to linezolid with potentially better safety

Availability:

  • IV and oral formulations
  • Global trial for diabetic foot infection ongoing

Afabicin: Selective anti-staphylococcal agent


Novel FabI inhibitor with unique selectivity

Mechanism:

  • Enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) inhibitor
  • Targets fatty acid synthesis
  • Highly selective for S. aureus

Not active against:

  • Other gram-positives
  • Gram-negatives

Clinical Development:

  • Phase 2: Noninferior to vancomycin/linezolid for staphylococcal ABSSSI
  • Planned: Bone and joint infection trials

Advantages:

  • Narrow spectrum = antimicrobial stewardship friendly
  • Novel MOA

Gepotidacin: Novel topoisomerase inhibitor


First-in-class triazaacenaphthylene for uUTI and gonorrhea

Mechanism:

  • Inhibits DNA gyrase AND topoisomerase IV
  • Distinct binding site from fluoroquinolones
  • Active against FQ-resistant strains

Spectrum:

  • Gram-positives
  • Gram-negatives including MDR E. coli
  • MDR N. gonorrhoeae

Dosing (oral):

  • uUTI: 1500 mg BID × 5 days
  • Gonorrhea: 3000 mg × 2 doses (10-12h apart)

Phase 3 Results:

  • Noninferior to nitrofurantoin (uUTI)
  • Noninferior to ceftriaxone + azithromycin (gonorrhea)

Addressing a Critical Need


Gepotidacin provides an oral option for gonorrhea - crucial as resistance to ceftriaxone emerges

Zoliflodacin: Single-dose gonorrhea treatment


First-in-class spiropyrimidinetrione for N. gonorrhoeae

Mechanism:

  • Type II topoisomerase inhibitor
  • Unique binding sites on DNA gyrase
  • Distinct from fluoroquinolones

Key advantage:

Active against strains resistant to:

  • Cephalosporins
  • Fluoroquinolones
  • Other drug classes

Phase 3 Results:

Single 3-g oral dose:

  • Noninferior to IM ceftriaxone + oral azithromycin
  • High cure rates for urogenital/rectal infection
  • Lower efficacy for pharyngeal infection

Clinical Pearl


Single-dose oral therapy dramatically improves treatment adherence - critical for STI management

Other Agents: Brief overview


  • Broad-spectrum (gram-pos/gram-neg)
  • ZEUS trial: Noninferior to pip-tazo for cUTI/AP
  • Oral form available in US, IV and oral in ITaly

Ridinilazole:

  • Bibenzidamole disrupting cell division
  • Targeted activity against C. difficile
  • “Microbiome sparing”
  • Pivotal Ri-CoDIFy 1 and 2 Phase 3 trials, ridinilazole failed to demonstrate superiority to oral vancomycin on sustained clinical response, missing the primary endpoint needed for approval.

Ibezapolstat:

  • DNA polymerase IIIC inhibitor
  • Also targets C. difficile
  • Microbiome sparing
  • Awaiting phase III trials
  • First-in-class LeuRS inhibitor
  • An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase required for protein synthesis. Mechanistically it uses the so-called OBORT mechanism (oxaborole tRNA trapping)
  • In development for NTM infections. Repurposed after rapid development of resistance in gram-negatives
  • Activity against MAC and M. abscessus
  • Available outside US for decades
  • Narrow spectrum (staphylococci)
  • Usually adjunctive therapy

Part 4: Summary and Conclusions

Novel agents summary table


Agent Target Key Indications Status
SUL-DUR CRAB HABP/VABP FDA approved, AIFA waiting
ATM-AVI MBL-Enterobacterales cIAI, HABP/VABP Late development
FEP-ENM ESBL cUTI/AP FDA approved, No AIFA approval
FEP-TAN CRE, MBL cUTI/AP Phase 3 complete
FEP-ZID XDR-PA, CRE cUTI/AP Phase 3
MER-XER CRE, MBL, CRAB cUTI/AP, HABP/VABP Phase 3
Sulopenem MDR Enterobacterales uUTI FDA approved
Ceftobiprole MRSA Bacteremia, ABSSSI, CABP FDA, AIFA approved
Gepotidacin MDR E. coli, N. gonorrhoeae uUTI, gonorrhea FDA approved, AIFA waiting
Zoliflodacin MDR N. gonorrhoeae Gonorrhea FDA approved, AIFA waiting

Key takeaways


  1. The AMR challenge is growing - MDR organisms continue to emerge faster than new treatments

  2. Critical priority pathogens (CRAB, CRE) now have improved treatment options with novel BL/BLI combinations

  3. MBL-producing organisms - ATM-AVI and FEP-TAN address this previously untreatable gap

  4. Oral options expanding - Sulopenem, tebipenem, gepotidacin (Ross et al., 2025; Wagenlehner et al., 2024)

  5. Economic sustainability remains a challenge - pull incentives needed alongside push incentives

  6. Antimicrobial stewardship essential - new agents should be reserved for appropriate indications

Clinical decision framework


Suspected MDR Gram-Negative or Gram-Positive Infection
Organism Identification?
A. baumannii
SUL-DUR
or MER-XER
Enterobacterales
Resistance mechanism?
ESBL
FEP-ENM
KPC
Existing options,
FEP-TAN, or MER-XER
MBL
ATM-AVI,
FEP-TAN, or MER-XER
P. aeruginosa
MBL-producing?
Yes
FEP-ZID
(when available)
No
Existing
options
MRSA
Ceftobiprole
or existing options
N. gonorrhoeae
Gepotidacin /
Zoliflodacin
(when available)

Looking Forward


Promising developments:

  • Multiple agents in Phase 3 trials
  • First MBL-active inhibitors approaching market
  • Oral options for MDR infections expanding

Ongoing challenges:

  • Post-approval sustainability for manufacturers
  • Appropriate use and stewardship
  • Continued emergence of novel resistance mechanisms

Final Thought


New antibiotics are necessary but not sufficient - stewardship, infection prevention, and diagnostics must work together to combat AMR

Supplementary: Dosing Quick Reference


Agent Dose Frequency Infusion Renal Adjustment
SUL-DUR 2 g (1g-1g) q6h 3 hours Yes
ATM-AVI 1500-500 mg* q6h 3 hours Yes
FEP-ENM 2-0.5 g q8h 2 hours Yes
FEP-TAN 2.5 g (2g-500mg) q8h 2 hours Yes
FEP-ZID 3 g (2g-1g) q8h 3 hours Yes
MER-XER 2-1 g q8h 3 hours Yes
Ceftobiprole 500 mg q6-8h 2 hours Yes

*Loading dose: 500-167 mg

Clinical Pearl


Extended infusions optimize time above MIC for these β-lactam agents

Supplementary: Mechanism Comparison


Sulbactam-Durlobactam
β-Lactam
Sulbactam
Binds PBP1 & PBP3
BLI
Durlobactam
Inhibits OXA enzymes
Aztreonam-Avibactam
β-Lactam
Aztreonam
Intrinsically stable to MBLs
BLI
Avibactam
Inhibits serine β-lactamases
Cefepime-Taniborbactam
β-Lactam
Cefepime
Binds PBPs
BLI
Taniborbactam
Inhibits Class A, B, C, D
Meropenem-Xeruborbactam
β-Lactam
Meropenem
Binds PBPs
BLI
Xeruborbactam
Inhibits Class A, B, C, D

References


Cornely OA, Cisneros JM, Torre-Cisneros J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of aztreonam/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in hospitalized adults: Results from the REJUVENATE study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2020;75:618–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkz497.
Eckburg PB, Muir L, Critchley IA, Walpole S, Kwak H, Phelan A-M, et al. Oral tebipenem pivoxil hydrobromide in complicated urinary tract infection. New England Journal of Medicine 2022;386:1327–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2105462.
Holland TL, Cosgrove SE, Doernberg SB, et al. Ceftobiprole for treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. New England Journal of Medicine 2023;389:1390–401. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2300220.
Kaye KS, Rice LB, Dane A, Stus V, Sagan O, Fedosiuk E, et al. Fosfomycin for injection (ZTI-01) versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection including acute pyelonephritis: ZEUS, a phase 2/3 randomized trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2019;69:2045–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz181.
Kaye KS, Shorr AF, Wunderink RG, et al. Efficacy and safety of sulbactam-durlobactam versus colistin for the treatment of patients with serious infections caused by acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex: A multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial (ATTACK). The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2023;23:1072–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00184-6.
Pfizer Inc. Pfizer announces positive topline results from phase 3 REVISIT study of aztreonam-avibactam 2023.
Puttagunta S, Aronin SI, Gupta J, Das AF, Gupta K, Dunne MW. Sulopenem versus amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection. NEJM Evidence 2025. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400414.
Ross JDC, Wilson K, Workowski KA, Gatsi S, Perry CR, Scangarella-Oman NE, et al. Oral gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhoea (EAGLE-1): A phase 3 randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre study. The Lancet 2025;405:1608–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00628-2.
Sader HS, Mendes RE, Carvalhaes CG, et al. Antimicrobial activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparator agents when tested against a large collection of contemporary enterobacterales clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2023;67:e0121622. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01216-22.
Sati H, Crawley FP, Carrara E, et al. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024: A prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2025;25:e301–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00600-7.
Wagenlehner F, Perry CR, Hooton TM, Scangarella-Oman NE, Millns H, Powell M, et al. Oral gepotidacin versus nitrofurantoin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3): Two randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. The Lancet 2024;403:741–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02196-7.
Wunderink RG, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Rahav G, et al. Effect and safety of cefepime-enmetazobactam vs piperacillin-tazobactam in complicated urinary tract infection: The ALLIUM phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2024;331:124–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.24816.
Yuan Z, Zhao D, Liang Y, Jiang Y, Shi W, Wang Y, et al. A phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2022;77:1762–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac073.